Graphic · Data Centers · 2026

AI Data Center Power Consumption vs. Cities (2026)

Meta's planned 5-gigawatt Hyperion campus in Louisiana would use 43.8 terawatt-hours a year running flat out, more than every major city we compared except New York. The City Line-Up ranks eight gigawatt-scale AI campuses against the cities they now rival.

Fig. 1

The City Line-Up

Annual electricity use of 13 U.S. cities (gray rungs, TWh, log scale) and what eight gigawatt-scale AI data center campuses would use running at full power all year (dashed blue rungs), with the rank each campus would take among the cities.

U.S. cities vs. AI data center campusesAnnual electricity use · TWh5102050New York City 50.1 TWhHyperion (5 GW): 43.8 TWh → #2San Antonio 25.9 TWhAmazon IN (2.4 GW): 21 TWh → #3Los Angeles 20.7 TWhFairwater (2 GW): 17.5 TWh → #4Phoenix 17.5 TWhSusquehanna (1.92 GW): 16.8 TWh → #5Austin 14.6 TWhMemphis 13.7 TWhPhiladelphia 13.1 TWhJacksonville 13 TWhNashville 12.3 TWhFrontier (1.4 GW): 12.3 TWh → #10Stargate WI (1.3 GW): 11.4 TWh → #10Stargate TX (1.2 GW): 10.5 TWh → #10Sacramento 10.5 TWhSeattle 9.1 TWhPrometheus (1 GW): 8.8 TWh → #12New Orleans 5.6 TWhMadison, Wis. 3.2 TWh

Campus values are derived: planned capacity × 8,760 hours. Real campuses run below full power (LBNL estimates about 50% average use of interconnection capacity), so treat them as ceilings. City figures differ in definition and year: New York City is NYISO Zone J grid load (2025); Philadelphia and Phoenix are citywide use from city inventories (2022); the rest are 2025 retail sales of the utility serving each city, whose territory can extend past city limits.

Meta Hyperion at full power, per year
43.8 TWh
5 GW × 8,760 hours; 87% of New York City's 2025 load (derived)
Homes' worth of power in 1 GW, all year
~812,000
8.76 TWh ÷ 10,791 kWh per U.S. home (2022), derived
U.S. data center electricity use, 2024
192 TWh
4.7% of U.S. electricity; 649 TWh projected for 2030
SourceLBNL14 · Full citations
Large loads seeking to connect to Texas's grid
474 GW
As of June 2026; ~90% are data centers (ERCOT)
Fig. 2

Meta's Hyperion is twice the size of any other planned AI campus

Largest AI data centers by planned power capacity, gigawatts, as stated by the developer or its utility.

Meta Hyperion5 GWAmazon Indiana2.4 GWMicrosoft Fairwater2 GWAmazon Susquehanna1.92 GWVantage Frontier1.4 GWStargate Wisconsin1.3 GWStargate Abilene1.2 GWMeta Prometheus1 GW+

Stargate Wisconsin is the Vantage / OpenAI / Oracle site at Port Washington. Developers measure capacity differently: Meta says "compute capacity", Crusoe "total power capacity", Vantage Frontier "GPU compute capacity". Susquehanna is the power Talen will deliver to Amazon under contract, and Port Washington is WEC Energy's demand forecast through 2030 (Vantage itself says "close to a gigawatt" of AI capacity). Most campuses are still being built.

Fig. 3

At full power, Hyperion would use more electricity than 19 states

Data center electricity use vs. state electricity use: Hyperion at full power vs. 2025 retail sales of the states nearest in size, TWh

Mississippi49.5 TWhHyperion, full power43.8 TWhKansas41.5 TWhNevada39.8 TWhNebraska37.6 TWhUtah35.3 TWhWest Virginia33.7 TWhNew Mexico31.5 TWhNorth Dakota30.3 TWhConnecticut27.7 TWhIdaho26.8 TWh

Hyperion is 5 GW × 8,760 hours (derived). Below Idaho, the states it would also exceed are Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Alaska and Vermont (5.5 TWh), plus the District of Columbia. State values are all-sector retail sales.

Fig. 4

Even at half power, Hyperion would out-use Los Angeles

Hyperion's annual electricity use at full power and at 50% average use vs. Los Angeles and Phoenix, TWh

Hyperion, full power43.8 TWhHyperion, 50% use21.9 TWhLos Angeles (LADWP)20.7 TWhPhoenix17.5 TWh

LBNL estimates that U.S. data centers use about 50% of their grid interconnection capacity on average, "due to high redundancy requirements and maintenance needs." Both Hyperion values are derived; Meta does not publish expected annual use. Los Angeles is 2025 retail sales; Phoenix is 2022 citywide use.

Fig. 5

Amazon has contracted 77% of a nuclear plant's capacity

Susquehanna nuclear plant (Pa.) generating capacity, megawatts: power contracted to Amazon's data center campus vs. the rest

77.0%23.0%
  • Contracted to Amazon1,920 MW77.0%
  • Rest of the plant574 MW23.0%
  • Susquehanna generating capacity2,494 MW100%

Talen will supply 1,920 MW to Amazon through 2042, ramping to full volume no later than 2032. Plant capacity (2,494 MW) is from Talen's 2025 10-K; Talen owns 90% of the plant. "Rest of the plant" and the 77% share are derived. Running all year, 1,920 MW is 16.8 TWh, more than Philadelphia's 13.1 TWh in 2022.

Fig. 6

U.S. data centers could use more power than Texas by 2030

U.S. data center electricity use, TWh: 2024 estimate and LBNL Reference Case forecasts

0175350525700202420282030Texas retail sales, 2025: 533 TWh649 TWh192 TWh

2024 is LBNL's last historical year; 2028 and 2030 are Reference Case forecasts (2030 range: 521–843 TWh). LBNL publishes no values in between, so the lines are straight segments. Excludes cryptocurrency mining. Texas is EIA 2025 retail sales, the largest of any state.